Patent Reform "Call to Action"

Letter Writing Campaign

With legislation as important as the Patent "Reform" Act S.515, it is imperative for concerned citizens to contact their Senators to state their concerns. California's Senators are Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer.

NOTE: Due to security screening, postal letters may take several weeks to reach government officials. Electronic mail or facsimile delivery is not subject to security delays.

Contact Information

Senator Barbara Boxer

Send a letter:
Senator Barbara Boxer
United States Senate
112 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510

Call the Senator: (202) 224-3553

Fax the Senator: Fax: (202) 224-0454

Contact via email:
https://boxer.senate.gov/contact/email/policy.cfm

Senator Dianne Feinstein

Send a letter:
Senator Dianne Feinstein
United States Senate
331 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510

Call the Senator: (202) 224-3841

Fax the Senator: Fax: (202) 228-3954

Contact via email:
http://feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=ContactUS.EmailMe

Congressman Mike Honda

Send a letter:
Congressman Mike Honda
United States Congress
1713 Longworth HOB
Washington, DC 20515

Call the Congressman: (202) 225-2631

Fax the Congressman: Fax: (202) 225-2699

Contact via email:
http://honda.house.gov/contactmike.shtml

For Other Congressional representation, please refer to:
http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml


 

Sample Letters

Here are some sample letters for your example and use. You are encouraged to personalize the letter to better explain your views.

  • Letter for Senators Boxer and Feinstein 

http://207.47.34.112:8080/images/pdf-icon.jpghttp://207.47.34.112:8080/images/word-icon.jpg

  • Letter for Non-California Senators
http://207.47.34.112:8080/images/pdf-icon.jpghttp://207.47.34.112:8080/images/word-icon.jpg
  • Letter to House of Representatives
http://207.47.34.112:8080/images/pdf-icon.jpghttp://207.47.34.112:8080/images/word-icon.jpg

Additional Sample Letters to Government Officials

 


 Talking Points on Patent Reform

(Rev.2009.05.14)
  •  Legislation will weaken patents, which is bad for innovation.
  • The opposition is large and diverse -- including inventors, teachers, universities, venture capitalists, unions, and small businesses.
  • Damages provisions are unfair to innovators.
    Inventors rely on strong patents to protect their investments, and the proposed legislation does not adequately compensate inventors for the theft of their inventions.  Any legislation relating to determining a "reasonable royalty" should assure that all inventors can obtain adequate compensation for infringement of their patents.
  • Harms Investment.
    Investment in technology requires strong patents to sustain a competitive edge.  This legislation devalues patents and discourages innovation and investment
  • Ties up small inventors for years.
    The opposition provision could tie up small inventors for years, depriving them of the ability to protect their innovation or continue inventing.
  • Harms Jobs
    Devalued patents leads to weakened business and encourages foreign penetration into the United States economy, which results in a loss of jobs.
  • Harms Education
    Patents are important to universities.  Weakened patents lead to less income for universities.
What should be done to solve the problems within the Patent System?
  • Fully fund the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO);
  • Allow the USPTO to retain all of its user fees;
  • Encourage the USPTO to invest in additional human and other resources; and
  • Revise metrics for USPTO examiners' compensation to encourage and reward quality of examination, not quantity of applications reviewed.